By Gerald Timian, November guest blogger
Educators and those of us who are working to increase college access and career success for low-income and working-class students need to develop strategies that help these students gain the social skills and institutional savvy to be successful.
In my November post, “When Prometheus’ Fire Isn’t Enough,” I talked about my brother and his struggle to make the cultural shifts necessary to make the most of his college education.
Continuing on that theme, let’s probe deeper to understand what advantages middle-class students bring to their college and university experience that are part of their unconscious social patterns and help them have success in school.
First, let me say that I know that many of my statements to follow are generalizations and there are low-income and working-class students who beat the odds and are successful in college. My use of these generalizations is to illustrate that too many of these students start down the path of higher education and never reach the finish line.
Many middle-class children begin performing for adults outside of their families at very young ages — dance and piano recitals, sports teams, and so on. Participating in these activities teaches youth that what they do is important to adults and that they are entitled to adult time, talent, and understanding.
Low-income and working-class youth often have fewer expectations from adults. They have been raised to listen to adults and not to question their authority.
What impact do these two very different expectations have on a youth’s college education? My children were raised in a middle-class neighborhood with neighbors who were academics. They saw these neighbors mowing their lawns; they played with their children, heard them tell bad jokes and called them by their first names. In other words, they saw them as people and caring adults. When my children went off to college they were not intimidated by their professors because they saw them as caring adults, not unlike their own parents.
Oftentimes, the only interaction low-income youth have with middle-class people is in some type of formal role; this group is usually limited to teachers, police officers, social workers and ministers. The youths interact with this group of people in a formal manner and see them as authority figures.
When these students enter college they see professors and instructors not as caring adults but as authority figures with a great deal of power over their lives. My children wouldn’t give it a second thought to go to a professor’s office and expect to have all their questions answered until they had an understanding of the material. However, low-income students may be too intimidated to ask for personal help and if they do ask for help they listen with respect and do not ask follow-up questions to get the clarity they need to master the material.
How do colleges and universities have to change their approach so low-income students can begin to see their professors and instructors as older colleagues and guides who are involved in similar educational and intellectual pursuits?
Multiple studies show that low-income and working-class students are more confident and comfortable in the company of peers. I know in my own situation that my mentor treated me like a younger colleague, challenging me to take on difficult ideas.
Another advantage middle-class youth have is that their parents are more likely to spend time with them problem solving. A middle-class youth can go to his or her parents with questions and in most cases the parent will answer the question with another question, which helps their child go deeper into the issue. This in turn puts the child in a position to explore the issues from many angles. Eventually children in these situations come to their own solution to the question.
Because middle-class kids have greater odds of participating in performance activities from such an early age they have an understanding of doing and redoing until they have the skills perfected under the scrutiny of caring adults. When they go off to college they have the patience and persistence to work and rework their writing. They understand the concept of the first draft.
One of my biggest frustrations when visiting a museum or art gallery is that the artist’s finished work is on display and you never see the multiple drafts and failed pieces. I wish I could take students to the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam. It is a fascinating, multilevel gallery designed to show the works of Van Gogh from his earliest sketches to his later masterpieces. For me, the most interesting pieces in the museum were his early works, which were mediocre, and you cannot imagine that from that body of work a master artist would develop.
To be able to help students understand that their first attempt does not have to be the finished one is one of the great insights of their educational journey.
Given that most professors and instructors come from the upper and middle classes, it is important that we continue to educate them about the needs and perspectives of students from low-income and working-class backgrounds. These are the students they increasingly will be seeing in their classrooms.
I have asked a researcher from the University of Minnesota to begin a series of interviews with low-income and working-class students to get a better understanding of how these students see themselves becoming successful in college and in their careers.
My hope is that this information will give us new insights into how to create a democratic and equitable educational system for the 21st century.
Recent Comments