By Dale A. Blyth, Ph.D., February guest blogger
The idea of equal educational opportunities in America has been a driving force for a long time. From the Brown vs. Board of Education decision that separate schools are inherently unequal — to a variety of present day efforts to improve schools, we continue to believe educational opportunities are the key to a better future. Education still benefits from its image as the great equalizer even if schools are decreasingly seen as delivering on that goal.
Today these efforts more often are denoted by the poor result — the achievement gap — than by the cry for equal opportunity. And unfortunately Minnesota is a leader in almost all the wrong ways in this area with the second worst achievement gap in the nation. It is not just that our white students do better but that our minority students do worse.
What would happen if we shifted back to a social justice approach that emphasized the importance of equal opportunities — but with an important twist. What if we called for equality in LEARNING opportunities?
Why shift from “education” to “learning” language? Because our society has shifted to a 24/7 array of learning opportunities related to technology, media and fundamental changes in our economy and way of life. In the report A New Day For Learning there is a call to rethink the learning day as well as the time and places where learning occurs. We must begin to shift from an emphasis on education as formal schooling only and learners only as students. Instead we need to recognize that learning takes place in many ways, at many different times, and in many different places. We need to move from only caring about the equality of opportunities for students in school and begin to think about equalizing opportunities for children and youth as active engaged learners in families, schools, programs and communities.
Youth as engaged learners with equal access to an array of learning opportunities should become our driving goal. Youth certainly need opportunities to become engaged in school as students focused on learning content and skills. But they also need opportunities to become engaged in informal settings with parents, mentors, peers and community members in learning about new places and ideas such as visiting museums or engaged in community service. And just as important, and perhaps an area where we can make more systematic progress, are opportunities to become engaged in non-formal settings such as youth programs where youth choose what they want to learn and can develop a sense of mastery, belonging and confidence that they are important actors in their own learning and that what they do matters.
Perhaps dramatically increasing the percentage of youth at age 14 who are constructively engaged in their own learning through multiple learning opportunities is just as important a goal as reading by third grade.
We must find ways to shift the debate from a narrow focus on equal educational opportunities through schools designed to close a test score gap, toward the far larger problems of inequality in access to quality LEARNING opportunities — opportunities that are a mix of informal, non-formal and formal. Such a debate must come to recognize and address the inequalities in access to and the value of engagement in summer, afterschool and the variety of community learning opportunities beyond the classroom. It is these inequalities that are both a major cause of the achievement gap as well as a major source of young people’s disengagement from the learning process.
It is this OPPORTUNITY GAP that we must close from cradle to career if we are to not only close the achievement gap but support success for all youth in college, work, citizenship and life.
Thank you Dale for a thoughtful article on learning,equality, and opportunity. The sooner we acknowledge the reality of unequal learning opportunities,the closer we will come to finding a solution strategy. My hope is Minnesota will be led by a strong vision. Youthprise is committed to working with other organizations and across sectors to close the opportunity gap.
Posted by: wokie weah | February 02, 2012 at 10:25 AM
Thanks for starting this conversation. I have an educational background in special education, and one of my very wise professors drummed into our heads that fair doesn’t mean equal. I agree that there are unequal learning opportunities for youth, but what if we looked at it through the lens of fairness? Would be see an even larger gap?
Having the frame of fairness has allowed me to think about youth programming in a more responsive way because opportunities are built around what is best for the community or individual. What is best for one youth may not be best for all youth. It also doesn’t necessitate that quantity is the most important driver.
What are your thoughts on this switch from equality to fairness?
Posted by: Samantha Grant | February 02, 2012 at 01:23 PM
Dale, thanks for making this important statement. It is exactly what I have been trying to get through to legislators and administrators. All recent research backs you up, and we aren't going to close the "achievement gap" in classroom learning until we work with the "whole child" as they are growing up.
Posted by: State Representative Joe Mullery | February 02, 2012 at 01:46 PM